#Combat arms 2016 trial#

military, as a servicemember or civilian contractor, at some point between 20? Punitive damages to punish 3M for its years of misconduct.īy this point, here’s what you’re probably asking yourself: “Do I qualify for this lawsuit?” If the answer to the following three questions is “Yes”, you might have a claim:.Compensation for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life due to hearing problems and.Compensation for past and future loss of income.Compensation for past and future medical expenses, such as doctor visits, prescriptions, and hearing aids.Compensation and Eligibility Users of the earplugs might be entitled to:

#Combat arms 2016 trial#

The first bellwether trial is scheduled to take place in early 2021.

3M’s acts constituted a continuing fraud that rendered it impossible for users to become aware of the earplug’s defects.ĭiscovery and motions in this case are ongoing, and more servicemembers and veterans file cases each day.

3M distorted scientific sources in the course of marketing, advertising, and promoting the earplugs.

Despite being aware of the defects as early as 2000, 3M represented the earplugs as more effective than they actually were for almost a decade and a half.

The defective design of the earplug caused the device to loosen imperceptibly in Plaintiffs’ ear canals.

The earplugs were defectively designed, preventing users from getting a proper fit and seal.

Some of Plaintiffs’ material allegations are This led to the filing of lawsuits by some former users, primarily U.S.

Disclosure of Defects and Lawsuits 3M’s misdeeds became public following a whistleblower suit concerning the earplug’s development and false marketing. This earplug was the exclusive dual-ended earplug of the military from 2003 until 2015. Most crucially, the earplugs tended not to fit and seal properly, and they were much less effective at blocking sound than 3M claimed. However, the company appears to have hidden certain defects and made what are now known to be serious misrepresentations about the effectiveness of the earplugs in order to get this contract. In 2002, 3M obtained a contract to supply the military with this earplug. Broadly speaking, the closed position was supposed to be used to block out noise and the open position was intended to filter out a substantial amount of noise yet still allow the user to hear orders and otherwise engage in conversation with those nearby.

That design eventually became the 3M Dual-Ended Combat Arms Earplug. The Earplugs Around the year 2000, 3M (the relevant complaints name multiple defendants, but for ease of reference, I use “3M” to refer to all of the defendants) developed a dual-ended earplug design. Read on to learn about the lawsuit and see if you might qualify (or, if you want to skip to our Evaluation Form, just scroll down to the bottom of this page). But what, exactly, is going on? If you served in the military or as a civilian contractor for the military between 20, you might just have a claim.

3M Dual-Ended Combat Arms Earplug Litigation In recent months, you’ve probably heard something about a lawsuit against the company 3M, manufacturers of the 3M Dual-Ended Combat Arms Earplugs.